Project Management in Instructional Design

Thursday, July 12, 2012

Communicating Effectively



In this exercise, we had to interpret a message delivered in three different modalities; text, audio, and video.  Additionally, a synthesis is included about the implications of effective communication in project management.    




Interpretation of a Message in Different Modalities

Email


The email represented the written form of the message. It was polite, concise, and clear.  It has no auditory input, so the tone of the message had to be interpreted only by the words used to convey the message.  An advantage of using email messages to communicate is that it can be documented and it is accessible at any time.  On the other hand, a disadvantage is that there is no immediate feedback or clarification from the sender or the receiver. 

 Voicemail


The voicemail represented the auditory form of the message.  It was a bit informal and the tone could be perceived as less friendly.  An advantage of the voicemail is that is more personal and the feedback could be more immediate than the written form.  A disadvantage of this modality is the lack of visual input to determine body language. 

Face2Face


The face2face represented the video form of the message.  It was friendly and it has both, the visual and the auditory input.  In addition, it could be documented.  A downfall might be that it does not allow for immediate clarification of two way conversation. 

Synthesis


Portney, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, and Kramer (2008) indicate written and verbal communications as well as informal and formal communications are useful ways to exchange information in the field of project management.  Furthermore, the key to successful project management is the practice of effective communication.  Effective communication is achieved by sharing the right information with the right people in a timely manner.  Moreover, Dr. Stolovich discusses how effective communication is not just words, but it is influenced mostly by spirit and attitude, tonality and body language, timing, and the personality of the recipient (Laureate Education Inc., n.d.). 

Considering the factors that comprise an effective communication, it is fair to say that the face2face delivery of the message is the most effective one because it includes the visual and auditory input.  The visual input allows the receiver to watch the body language and the auditory input allows the recipient to determine the tone of the message.  In addition, the spirit and tonality of the message could also be interpreted.  Nevertheless, the email message could also be an effective way of communicating because it is clear, concise and could be documented.  I believe the voicemail is the least effective form of communication since there is just the auditory input with no visual and it is less specific because it is usually short in length. 

In short, when working on a project I think the best communication approach should be a combination of these modalities.  Portney, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, and Kramer (2008) suggest that in project management it is very important to keep everyone that is involved in a project informed at all times.  As a result, choosing the best communication approach will depend on the recipients, the timing, and the nature of the message.  Vince Budovich explains that the project manager should tailor the communication strategy to fit the specific need of the stakeholder (Laureate Education Inc., n.d.).  In other words, these elements will help the project manager to determine the modality that will allow the most effective way to convey a message.   In the end, the most important thing is to choose the communication approach that fits best according to the situation and that has proven to be effective in conveying the message. 

References


Laureate Education, Inc.  (n.d.).  [Video Program].  Communicating with stakeholders, Dr. Harold Stolovich.  Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_1340289_1%26url%3D

Laureate Education, Inc.  (n.d.).  [Video Program].  Practitioner voices: Strategies for working with stakeholders, Vince Budovich. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_1340289_1%26url%3D

Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M. & Kramer, B. E.  (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects.  New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 




3 comments:

  1. Michelle,

    I agree that face to face communication is the most effective form because each person shares verbal and non verbal cues, which helps to decipher the message and the meaning. The tips offered on this website are similar to those discussed in this week’s video with Dr. Stolovich.

    1. Time taken to communicate among a team dramatically increases with team size.

    2. The most effective way to reduce this is to hold regular, consistent meetings, so team members don’t have to repeat the same information with each other.

    3. Project managers can assist in the communication process if they act as a central collation point.

    4. Communication is improved if the project manager condenses or filters the information prior to distributing it to the project team.

    Project Communication Guide (2012). Effective Communication.. Retrieved from
    http://www.projectmanagementguide.org/project-management/effective-communication

    Jan

    ReplyDelete
  2. Michelle, this is another one of those times when how we perceive something is so different, even though we read, heard and watched the same media. I was entirely put off by the F2F mode, as I didn't like Jane's tone or the sense that she was being falsely apologetic. I liked the email, because it said what needed to be said, and I thought the voice mail conveyed that sense of urgency that a deadline brings about, so I would likely use those two modes before I would consider the F2F visit. I might be perceiving something that Jane didn't intend to express in her tone and body language, but that demonstrates to me why it is so important to make sure the message holds the meaning without a lot of excess baggage hanging on.
    ~~ Lyn

    ReplyDelete
  3. Michelle,

    First, I want to say I love the design of your blog page. It is very creative.
    Effective c communication is a very important factor when working on a project or anything else. After looking at the different scenarios, I see why it is important. From looking at the different comments on people blogs, we all have different opinions of what we feel is the best approach. The effective communication that I chose was the email communication. I chose this communication because you are able to have a paper trail if you would need to refer back to that information. I do see how face-to-face communication would be an effective way of communicating because of the tonality and the body language where with email you can’t see. I do feel it depends on what you are working with will determine what type of approach would be the best approach to use.

    ReplyDelete