In the
field of project management, there is a common occurrence known as scope
creep. Portney, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer,
Sutton, and Kramer (2008) define scope creep as the tendency to improve the
project’s outcome as the project progresses.
The scope creep could come from the client as well as from the team
members. The problem with the scope
creep is that most of the time it delays the project’s timeline, increases the number
of resources, and/or the budget having a negative impact on the project’s
overall outcomes. Haughhey (2009) lists
the most common causes why scope creep occurs:
- Poor Requirements Analysis.
- Not Involving Users Early Enough.
- Underestimating the Complexity of the
Project.
- Lack of Change Control.
- Gold Plating
On the other
hand, Maynard (2005) suggests that the project manager should avoid scope creep
by creating contracts, communicating changes, and not overcommitting to what
the client wants if you know it will not work.
One good example that
relates to scope creep is when I was asked to design, develop, and implement a
language program for a technical college.
The project consisted in creating a 12-month program for adult students
to learn English. Some of the specifications
of the design were that it could stand alone like other career programs and
that it could bring many students quickly.
One problem was that this institution had a monthly entry and this
program was one of the six programs they had running. I told the client that there is a curricular
sequence that needs to be followed; especially in language teaching and that
the monthly entry would bring too many students too quickly affecting not only
the budget and the resources, but also the quality of the program. The client did not want to hear it because
they wanted many students quickly. The
program started with 20 students and after a few months it grew to have 260
students. This created a total chaos, for
example:
·
They did not have enough room for classes.
·
They needed more teachers, but did not want spend money.
·
They needed more resources but did not want to spend money.
They began
merging classes to have more space and this ruined the curricular sequence
consequently affecting the quality of the program. In the end, the students started dropping
from the program and protesting, so the institution ended up closing the
program to have more space for the career programs because these were more
expensive. In reality, they lost a lot
of money because this was their biggest program, but they did not care for
quality; only quantity.
In
this case, the client did receive what was requested, but it was not successful
because I failed to formalize the project’s processes and documents and
although I had anticipated the possible problems that could happen, I did not communicate
well these risks with my client. My mistake
was that I did not have the proper project management skills, forms, and
documents from the beginning of the project.
If I had properly followed the principles of good project management
such as being prepared with a project plan, scope, statement of work, schedule,
timeline, risk management plan, change control system, contingency plan,
communication plan, etc., the story would be different. Other important elements that were missing in
this case were the design of a monitoring and control system and communication
between the client and myself. If I had been more prepared, I probably would
have had the choice of controlling the project from the beginning or not taken
the project at all. But like Dr.
Budrovich said; “you can’t win them all”.
References
Haughey,
D. (2009). Stop scope creep running away with
your project. Project Smart. Retrieved
from http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/stop-scope-creep-running-away-with-your-project.html
Laureate
Education, Inc. (n.d.). [Video Program]. Practitioner voices: You can’t win them all. Dr. Petti Van Rekom. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_1340289_1%26url%3D
Maynard,
W. (2005). Project management: Avoid work scope creep!
Enzine Articles. Retrieved from http://ezinearticles.com/?Project-Management---Avoid-Work-Scope-Creep!&id=79899
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R.,
Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M. & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning,
scheduling, and controlling projects.
New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Hi Michelle, wow-now that is a project story! First of all, they should have given you a project "team" for this project, and not expected you to do this alone. Second, it is hard to fight with the almighty dollar. I am not sure if the best laid project plans and documentation would have been enough to convinced this school to slow down and do it the right way.
ReplyDeleteMichelle,
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like you were in a tough spot. In order for this project to be successful, you would definitely need funds and proper communication; and it seems that you did not have either. From learning different things each week about project management, having the SOW, scope, timeline, communication plan, etc would have made your project turn out better. Having these tools to guide you throughout the process would have made your project successful and also you would have known what you would need and not need.
ReplyDeleteVery nice blog! I really enjoyed your blog through out all the time I have spent on it! thanks for sharing such an informative. Its very helpful for me.
Project Management Degree